AI Readiness Assessment: Are You Ready to Implement AI?

Last Updated: January 23, 2026
Next Review: April 23, 2026

---

"We Weren't Ready. It Cost Us $400K."

A manufacturing company jumped into AI predictive maintenance without assessing readiness.

What they had:

• Budget: $500K
• Enthusiasm: High
• Executive support: Strong

What they didn't have:

• Clean data (sensors recorded inconsistently)
• Data infrastructure (no centralized database)
• Technical expertise (no data scientists)
• Change management plan (operators resisted)

Result: 18 months, $400K spent, project abandoned.

What they should have done: Assessed readiness first, fixed foundational issues, then implemented AI.

The lesson: Readiness matters more than budget.

---

The 8 Dimensions of AI Readiness

1. Data Readiness (Most Critical)

What you need:

• [ ] Sufficient volume: 1,000+ examples for supervised learning
• [ ] Data quality: < 5% errors, consistent format
• [ ] Data accessibility: Centralized, queryable database
• [ ] Data labeling: Labels for supervised learning (if applicable)
• [ ] Data governance: Policies for collection, storage, usage

Assessment questions:

• Do you have 1,000+ examples of the problem you're trying to solve?
• Is your data in a centralized location (not scattered across systems)?
• Is your data clean (< 5% errors, no major gaps)?
• Do you have labels for training (e.g., "fraud" vs "not fraud")?
• Do you have data governance policies?

Scoring:

• 5/5 Yes: Excellent (90-100 points) - Ready for AI
• 3-4 Yes: Good (60-89 points) - Minor improvements needed
• 1-2 Yes: Poor (30-59 points) - Major work needed
• 0 Yes: Not Ready (0-29 points) - Fix data first

Real example - Manufacturing company:

• Volume: ❌ Only 200 failure events
• Quality: ❌ 15% sensor errors
• Accessibility: ❌ Data in 5 different systems
• Labeling: ✅ Failures labeled
• Governance: ❌ No policies
• Score: 20/100 - Not ready

---

2. Technical Infrastructure

What you need:

• [ ] Cloud or on-prem compute: For training and inference
• [ ] Data storage: Scalable database (cloud or on-prem)
• [ ] APIs: To integrate AI with existing systems
• [ ] Monitoring: To track AI performance
• [ ] Version control: For models and code

Assessment questions:

• Do you have cloud infrastructure (AWS, Azure, GCP) or on-prem servers?
• Can you store and query large datasets (100GB+)?
• Do your systems have APIs for integration?
• Can you monitor system performance in real-time?
• Do you use version control (Git)?

Scoring:

• 5/5 Yes: Excellent (90-100 points)
• 3-4 Yes: Good (60-89 points)
• 1-2 Yes: Poor (30-59 points)
• 0 Yes: Not Ready (0-29 points)

Quick wins if score is low:

• Sign up for cloud provider ($100-$500/month to start)
• Implement basic database (PostgreSQL, MongoDB)
• Add APIs to critical systems
• Set up basic monitoring (Datadog, New Relic)

---

3. Technical Talent

What you need:

• [ ] Data scientists: To build models (1-2 people)
• [ ] ML engineers: To deploy models (1-2 people)
• [ ] Data engineers: To build pipelines (1-2 people)
• [ ] Software engineers: To integrate AI (2-4 people)

OR:

• [ ] AI vendor/consultant: To handle technical work
• [ ] Internal champion: To manage vendor and adoption

Assessment questions:

• Do you have data scientists on staff?
• Do you have ML engineers who can deploy models?
• Do you have data engineers who can build pipelines?
• Can you hire AI talent (budget + location)?
• Are you willing to work with external vendors?

Scoring:

• Have in-house team: Excellent (90-100 points)
• Can hire or have budget for vendor: Good (60-89 points)
• Limited budget, hard to hire: Poor (30-59 points)
• No budget, can't hire: Not Ready (0-29 points)

Options if score is low:

• Hire: $150K-$250K/year per data scientist
• Vendor: $100K-$500K project-based
• Train existing staff: $10K-$30K per person
• Hybrid: 1 in-house + vendor support

---

4. Business Case & ROI

What you need:

• [ ] Clear problem: Specific, measurable problem to solve
• [ ] Quantified benefit: $ value of solving the problem
• [ ] Budget: Sufficient for implementation
• [ ] Timeline: Realistic expectations (6-18 months)
• [ ] Success metrics: How you'll measure success

Assessment questions:

• Can you articulate the specific problem AI will solve?
• Have you quantified the benefit ($X saved or $Y revenue)?
• Do you have budget ($100K-$500K for typical project)?
• Do you have realistic timeline (not expecting results in 1 month)?
• Have you defined success metrics?

Scoring:

• 5/5 Yes: Excellent (90-100 points)
• 3-4 Yes: Good (60-89 points)
• 1-2 Yes: Poor (30-59 points)
• 0 Yes: Not Ready (0-29 points)

Use our tool: AI ROI Calculator

---

5. Executive Support

What you need:

• [ ] Executive sponsor: C-level champion
• [ ] Budget approval: Committed funding
• [ ] Strategic alignment: AI aligns with company strategy
• [ ] Patience: Willingness to invest 6-18 months
• [ ] Risk tolerance: Acceptance that AI may not work

Assessment questions:

• Do you have a C-level executive championing AI?
• Has budget been approved (not just "we'll find it")?
• Is AI part of your strategic plan?
• Are executives willing to wait 6-18 months for results?
• Are executives comfortable with 20-30% risk of failure?

Scoring:

• 5/5 Yes: Excellent (90-100 points)
• 3-4 Yes: Good (60-89 points)
• 1-2 Yes: Poor (30-59 points)
• 0 Yes: Not Ready (0-29 points)

Red flag: If executives expect results in 1-3 months, reset expectations or don't start.

---

6. Change Management

What you need:

• [ ] User buy-in: Employees who will use AI are supportive
• [ ] Training plan: How you'll train users
• [ ] Communication plan: How you'll communicate changes
• [ ] Incentives: Rewards for adoption
• [ ] Feedback loops: How users can report issues

Assessment questions:

• Have you talked to employees who will use the AI?
• Are they supportive (not resistant)?
• Do you have a training plan?
• Do you have a communication plan?
• Have you considered incentives for adoption?

Scoring:

• 5/5 Yes: Excellent (90-100 points)
• 3-4 Yes: Good (60-89 points)
• 1-2 Yes: Poor (30-59 points)
• 0 Yes: Not Ready (0-29 points)

Common mistake: Building AI without talking to users. Result: AI sits unused.

---

7. Compliance & Legal

What you need:

• [ ] Legal review: Lawyer reviewed AI use case
• [ ] Compliance assessment: Know which laws apply
• [ ] Privacy policies: Updated for AI
• [ ] Bias audit budget: If required (NYC, Colorado)
• [ ] Risk assessment: Legal and regulatory risks identified

Assessment questions:

• Have you consulted a lawyer about your AI use case?
• Do you know which AI laws apply to you?
• Are your privacy policies updated for AI?
• Have you budgeted for compliance (bias audits, etc.)?
• Have you assessed legal and regulatory risks?

Scoring:

• 5/5 Yes: Excellent (90-100 points)
• 3-4 Yes: Good (60-89 points)
• 1-2 Yes: Poor (30-59 points)
• 0 Yes: Not Ready (0-29 points)

Use our tools:

• Law Finder - Which laws apply
• Self-Audit - Compliance gaps

---

8. Process Maturity

What you need:

• [ ] Documented processes: Current process is documented
• [ ] Baseline metrics: You measure current performance
• [ ] Process stability: Process doesn't change frequently
• [ ] Improvement history: You've improved processes before
• [ ] Continuous improvement culture: Team embraces change

Assessment questions:

• Is your current process documented?
• Do you measure current performance (baseline metrics)?
• Is your process stable (not changing every month)?
• Have you successfully improved processes before?
• Does your team embrace continuous improvement?

Scoring:

• 5/5 Yes: Excellent (90-100 points)
• 3-4 Yes: Good (60-89 points)
• 1-2 Yes: Poor (30-59 points)
• 0 Yes: Not Ready (0-29 points)

Why this matters: If you can't measure current performance, you can't measure AI improvement.

---

Overall Readiness Score

Calculate Your Score

Add up scores from all 8 dimensions, then divide by 8.

Example:

• Data: 20/100
• Infrastructure: 60/100
• Talent: 40/100
• Business Case: 80/100
• Executive Support: 90/100
• Change Management: 30/100
• Compliance: 50/100
• Process Maturity: 70/100
• Average: 55/100

---

Interpretation

90-100: Excellent - Ready for AI

• All dimensions strong
• Low risk of failure
• Proceed with confidence
• Expected timeline: 6-12 months

70-89: Good - Minor Improvements Needed

• Most dimensions strong
• 1-2 weak areas
• Fix weak areas first (1-3 months)
• Then proceed
• Expected timeline: 9-15 months

50-69: Fair - Significant Work Needed

• Multiple weak areas
• High risk if you proceed now
• Spend 3-6 months improving readiness
• Then reassess
• Expected timeline: 12-24 months

30-49: Poor - Not Ready

• Major gaps in multiple areas
• Very high risk of failure
• Spend 6-12 months on fundamentals
• Don't start AI yet
• Expected timeline: 18-36 months

0-29: Not Ready - Fix Fundamentals First

• Critical gaps
• AI will fail
• Focus on data, infrastructure, talent
• Reassess in 12+ months
• Don't start AI

---

Readiness Improvement Roadmap

If Score is 50-69 (Fair)

Month 1-2: Data Foundation

• Centralize data into single database
• Clean data (fix errors, fill gaps)
• Implement data governance policies
• Cost: $20K-$50K

Month 3-4: Infrastructure

• Set up cloud infrastructure
• Implement APIs for key systems
• Set up monitoring
• Cost: $30K-$60K

Month 5-6: Talent & Planning

• Hire or engage vendor
• Develop detailed AI roadmap
• Get executive buy-in
• Cost: $50K-$100K

Total: 6 months, $100K-$210K investment before starting AI

---

If Score is 30-49 (Poor)

Quarter 1: Data

• Audit all data sources
• Build data warehouse
• Implement data quality processes
• Hire data engineer
• Cost: $100K-$200K

Quarter 2: Infrastructure & Talent

• Cloud infrastructure
• Hire or train technical team
• Implement DevOps practices
• Cost: $150K-$300K

Quarter 3: Process & Culture

• Document processes
• Implement metrics
• Change management training
• Cost: $50K-$100K

Quarter 4: Compliance & Planning

• Legal review
• Compliance assessment
• Detailed AI roadmap
• Cost: $50K-$100K

Total: 12 months, $350K-$700K investment before starting AI

---

Quick Wins to Improve Readiness

Data Readiness (Most Impact)

Quick win 1: Data centralization (2-4 weeks, $10K-$30K)

• Export data from all systems
• Load into cloud database (Snowflake, BigQuery)
• Immediate benefit: Single source of truth

Quick win 2: Data quality audit (1-2 weeks, $5K-$15K)

• Analyze data for errors, gaps, inconsistencies
• Prioritize fixes
• Immediate benefit: Know your data quality

Quick win 3: Data labeling (4-8 weeks, $20K-$60K)

• Label historical data for training
• Use internal team or vendor (Scale AI, Labelbox)
• Immediate benefit: Training data ready

---

Technical Infrastructure

Quick win 1: Cloud setup (1 week, $5K)

• Sign up for AWS/Azure/GCP
• Set up basic compute and storage
• Immediate benefit: Infrastructure ready

Quick win 2: API development (4-8 weeks, $30K-$60K)

• Add APIs to 3-5 critical systems
• Enable data exchange
• Immediate benefit: Integration ready

---

Technical Talent

Quick win 1: Hire consultant (1 week, $100K-$300K project)

• Engage AI consulting firm
• Get expertise immediately
• Immediate benefit: No hiring delay

Quick win 2: Train existing staff (3-6 months, $10K-$30K per person)

• Send engineers to AI bootcamp
• Online courses (Coursera, Udacity)
• Immediate benefit: Build internal capability

---

Real-World Examples

Example 1: E-Commerce Company (Score: 85/100)

Strengths:

• Data: 95/100 (millions of transactions, clean data)
• Infrastructure: 90/100 (cloud-native, APIs everywhere)
• Talent: 70/100 (2 data scientists, hiring more)
• Business case: 90/100 (clear ROI for recommendations)

Weaknesses:

• Change management: 60/100 (some resistance from merchandising team)
• Compliance: 70/100 (GDPR compliant, but need bias monitoring)

Action: Proceed with AI, address weaknesses in parallel

• Started product recommendation AI
• Implemented in 6 months
• ROI: 3,233% (from earlier example)

---

Example 2: Manufacturing Company (Score: 35/100)

Strengths:

• Executive support: 90/100 (CEO championing)
• Business case: 80/100 (clear value in predictive maintenance)

Weaknesses:

• Data: 20/100 (inconsistent sensor data, only 200 examples)
• Infrastructure: 30/100 (no cloud, no centralized database)
• Talent: 20/100 (no data scientists, hard to hire)
• Change management: 30/100 (operators resistant)

Action: Don't start AI yet. Fix fundamentals first.

• Spent 12 months improving data and infrastructure
• Hired 2 data scientists
• Then started AI
• Result: Successful implementation

---

Readiness Assessment Tool

Take the Assessment

Run Free Assessment (15 minutes)

Or manually score yourself:

For each dimension (1-8), answer 5 questions:

• 5 Yes = 100 points
• 4 Yes = 80 points
• 3 Yes = 60 points
• 2 Yes = 40 points
• 1 Yes = 20 points
• 0 Yes = 0 points

Average all 8 scores = Overall Readiness Score

---

Next Steps

If Score is 90-100 (Excellent):

1. Calculate ROI - Validate business case
2. Review use cases - Find proven examples
3. Read: Building Your First AI System - Implementation guide
4. Book consultation - Get started (30 min, free)

If Score is 70-89 (Good):

1. Identify weak areas - Focus on 1-2 lowest scores
2. Create improvement plan - 1-3 months to fix
3. Reassess - Take assessment again after improvements
4. Then proceed - Follow "Excellent" path above

If Score is 50-69 (Fair):

1. Don't start AI yet - High risk of failure
2. Follow improvement roadmap - 6 months of work
3. Focus on data first - Most critical dimension
4. Reassess in 6 months - Should reach 70+ score

If Score is < 50 (Poor/Not Ready):

1. Don't start AI - Will fail
2. Fix fundamentals - Data, infrastructure, talent
3. Consider traditional solutions - May be better fit
4. Reassess in 12 months - Major improvements needed

---

Frequently Asked Questions

Can we start AI with a low readiness score?

Technically yes, but high risk of failure.

Statistics:

• Score 90-100: 80% success rate
• Score 70-89: 60% success rate
• Score 50-69: 30% success rate
• Score < 50: 10% success rate

Recommendation: If score < 70, improve readiness first.

---

How long does it take to improve readiness?

Depends on current score:

• 70-89 → 90+: 1-3 months
• 50-69 → 70+: 3-6 months
• 30-49 → 70+: 6-12 months
• < 30 → 70+: 12-24 months

Fastest path: Focus on data first (biggest impact).

---

Can we improve readiness while implementing AI?

Risky but possible for minor gaps.

Safe: If score is 80+ and only 1 dimension is weak

• Example: 90/100 overall, but compliance is 60/100
• Can start AI and fix compliance in parallel

Risky: If score is < 80 or multiple dimensions are weak

• High chance of failure
• Better to fix first, then implement

---

What if we can't improve certain dimensions?

Example: Can't hire data scientists (location, budget)

Options:

1. Use vendor - Outsource technical work
2. Use AutoML - Tools that require less expertise (Google AutoML, H2O)
3. Start simpler - Choose easier AI use case
4. Wait - Until you can hire or budget increases

Don't proceed if you can't address critical gaps (especially data).

---

Disclaimer

This is educational content, not business or technical advice. Readiness assessment is a guide, not a guarantee of success.

Consult qualified AI consultants and technical experts for advice specific to your situation.

---

Last Updated: January 23, 2026
Next Review: April 23, 2026

Questions? Contact us or book a free consultation.