Documentation
Everything you need to know about AI compliance.
Documentation
Building Your First AI System
Step-by-step guide to building your first compliant AI system from scratch.
Building Your First AI System: Step-by-Step Implementation Guide
Last Updated: January 23, 2026
The 6-Phase Implementation Process
Phase 1: Problem Definition (Week 1)
Define the specific problem AI will solve with measurable success criteria.
Phase 2: Data Collection (Weeks 2-4)
Gather, clean, and label training data.
Phase 3: Model Development (Weeks 5-8)
Build and train AI model.
Phase 4: Integration (Weeks 9-12)
Connect AI to existing systems.
Phase 5: Testing (Weeks 13-14)
Validate accuracy and performance.
Phase 6: Deployment (Weeks 15-16)
Launch to production with monitoring.
Total timeline: 16 weeks (4 months)
Phase 1: Problem Definition
Goal: Crystal-clear problem statement with success metrics.
Activities:
- Define specific problem
- Identify stakeholders
- Set success criteria
- Estimate ROI
- Get approval
Example - Fraud Detection:
- Problem: Detect fraudulent transactions in real-time
- Current state: 70% detection rate, 5% false positives
- Target state: 95% detection rate, 1% false positives
- Success metric: Reduce fraud losses by 80%
- ROI: $1.6M savings vs. $350K cost = 457% ROI
Deliverable: One-page problem statement with metrics
Phase 2: Data Collection
Goal: 1,000+ clean, labeled examples.
Step 1: Data Audit (Week 2)
- Identify all data sources
- Assess data quality
- Estimate labeling effort
Step 2: Data Collection (Week 3)
- Extract data from systems
- Centralize in database
- Document data schema
Step 3: Data Cleaning (Week 3)
- Remove duplicates
- Fix errors
- Handle missing values
- Standardize formats
Step 4: Data Labeling (Week 4)
- Label training examples
- Use internal team or vendor
- Quality check labels
Example - Fraud Detection Data:
# Data structure
{
"transaction_id": "TXN123",
"amount": 1250.00,
"merchant": "Online Retailer",
"location": "New York, NY",
"time": "2026-01-23T14:30:00Z",
"user_history": {...},
"label": "fraud" # or "legitimate"
}
# Dataset size
- Total transactions: 100,000
- Fraudulent: 2,000 (2%)
- Legitimate: 98,000 (98%)
- Split: 70% train, 15% validation, 15% test
Cost: $20K-$60K (data labeling)
Phase 3: Model Development
Step 1: Choose Approach (Week 5)
Option A: Build from Scratch
- Full control
- Requires ML expertise
- Cost: $100K-$300K
- Timeline: 12-16 weeks
Option B: Use Pre-trained Model
- Faster (4-8 weeks)
- Less expertise needed
- Cost: $30K-$100K
- Limited customization
Option C: AutoML
- Easiest (2-4 weeks)
- No ML expertise needed
- Cost: $10K-$50K
- Good for simple problems
Recommendation: Start with Option B or C, move to A if needed.
Step 2: Model Training (Weeks 6-7)
# Example: Fraud detection with scikit-learn
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.metrics import classification_report
# Load data
X = df[['amount', 'merchant_risk', 'location_risk', 'time_risk']]
y = df['label']
# Split data
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(
X, y, test_size=0.15, random_state=42
)
# Train model
model = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100)
model.fit(X_train, y_train)
# Evaluate
y_pred = model.predict(X_test)
print(classification_report(y_test, y_pred))
Step 3: Model Tuning (Week 8)
- Hyperparameter optimization
- Feature engineering
- Cross-validation
- Bias testing
Deliverable: Trained model with 90%+ accuracy
Phase 4: Integration
Step 1: API Development (Week 9)
# FastAPI endpoint for fraud detection
from fastapi import FastAPI
import joblib
app = FastAPI()
model = joblib.load('fraud_model.pkl')
@app.post("/predict")
async def predict_fraud(transaction: Transaction):
features = extract_features(transaction)
prediction = model.predict([features])[0]
confidence = model.predict_proba([features])[0]
return {
"is_fraud": bool(prediction),
"confidence": float(confidence[1]),
"transaction_id": transaction.id
}
Step 2: System Integration (Weeks 10-11)
- Connect to transaction system
- Add logging
- Implement fallback logic
- Handle errors gracefully
Step 3: Monitoring Setup (Week 12)
- Track prediction accuracy
- Monitor latency
- Alert on anomalies
- Log all decisions
Deliverable: Working API integrated with systems
Phase 5: Testing
Step 1: Accuracy Testing (Week 13)
- Test on holdout dataset
- Measure precision, recall, F1
- Test edge cases
- Bias testing
Step 2: Performance Testing (Week 13)
- Load testing (1000 req/sec)
- Latency testing (< 100ms)
- Stress testing
- Failure scenarios
Step 3: User Acceptance Testing (Week 14)
- Test with real users
- Gather feedback
- Fix issues
- Document workflows
Deliverable: Test report with 95%+ accuracy
Phase 6: Deployment
Step 1: Staging Deployment (Week 15)
- Deploy to staging environment
- Run parallel with existing system
- Compare results
- Fix any issues
Step 2: Production Deployment (Week 16)
- Gradual rollout (10% → 50% → 100%)
- Monitor closely
- Keep fallback ready
- Document everything
Step 3: Post-Deployment (Ongoing)
- Monitor performance daily
- Retrain model monthly
- Update as needed
- Compliance audits
Deliverable: AI system live in production
Architecture Patterns
Pattern 1: Real-Time Prediction
User Request → API Gateway → AI Service → Response
↓
Logging Service
Use cases: Fraud detection, recommendation engines
Latency: < 100ms
Cost: $500-$2K/month (cloud compute)
Pattern 2: Batch Processing
Data Lake → Batch Job (nightly) → Predictions → Database
↓
Monitoring
Use cases: Demand forecasting, customer segmentation
Latency: 24 hours
Cost: $200-$800/month
Pattern 3: Hybrid
Real-time for urgent + Batch for non-urgent
Use cases: Email spam (real-time) + marketing (batch)
Common Pitfalls
Pitfall 1: Insufficient Data
Problem: Training with < 500 examples
Result: Poor accuracy (60-70%)
Solution: Collect more data or use simpler model
Pitfall 2: Data Leakage
Problem: Test data in training set
Result: Inflated accuracy (99% in test, 70% in production)
Solution: Strict train/test split
Pitfall 3: Overfitting
Problem: Model memorizes training data
Result: 99% train accuracy, 70% test accuracy
Solution: Regularization, cross-validation
Pitfall 4: Ignoring Bias
Problem: Model discriminates against protected groups
Result: Legal violations, reputational damage
Solution: Bias testing, fairness constraints
Pitfall 5: No Monitoring
Problem: Model degrades over time
Result: Accuracy drops from 95% to 70%
Solution: Continuous monitoring, automatic retraining
Cost Breakdown
Phase 1: Problem Definition - $10K
- Consulting: $10K
Phase 2: Data Collection - $40K
- Data labeling: $30K
- Data engineering: $10K
Phase 3: Model Development - $80K
- Data scientist (2 months): $40K
- ML engineer (2 months): $30K
- Infrastructure: $10K
Phase 4: Integration - $60K
- Software engineer (3 months): $50K
- DevOps: $10K
Phase 5: Testing - $20K
- QA engineer (2 weeks): $10K
- User testing: $10K
Phase 6: Deployment - $30K
- DevOps (2 weeks): $10K
- Monitoring setup: $10K
- Documentation: $10K
Total: $240K for 4-month project
Ongoing: $50K-$100K/year (maintenance, retraining, infrastructure)
Tools & Technologies
Data Processing
- Python: pandas, numpy
- Databases: PostgreSQL, MongoDB
- Data labeling: Scale AI, Labelbox
Model Development
- Frameworks: scikit-learn, TensorFlow, PyTorch
- AutoML: Google AutoML, H2O.ai
- Notebooks: Jupyter, Google Colab
Deployment
- APIs: FastAPI, Flask
- Cloud: AWS SageMaker, Google AI Platform, Azure ML
- Containers: Docker, Kubernetes
Monitoring
- Logging: Datadog, New Relic
- Model monitoring: Arize, Fiddler
- Alerts: PagerDuty
Next Steps
If you're ready to build:
- Assess readiness - Check if you're ready
- Calculate ROI - Validate business case
- Review compliance - Ensure legal compliance
- Book consultation - Get expert guidance
If you need help:
- Vendor selection guide - Find the right partner
- Contact us - Discuss your project
- Schedule demo - See HAIEC platform
Last Updated: January 23, 2026
Questions? Contact us